|
Accounting Firm
Accounting firms are simply enterprises devoted to the accounting service
that the private and public sector can use.Major accounting firms represent
an important industry that is worthy of study because they provide a significant
knowledge base for changes in management practice and, as such, are frequently
a catalyst for change within the industry. Further, their raw economic importance
is impossible to ignore: In 1994, the worldwide fee income of the Big Six reached
a staggering $33.5 billion (Economist, 1995, p. 62).
The members of the Big-Six accounting firms have been involved in international
business for a number of years. This involvement stemmed primarily from their
desire to follow important clients overseas. In seeking to serve these clients,
a variety of arrangements were subsequently developed across and within these
firms. To date, seven major types of arrangement have been utilized, usually
varying "according to the relationship between the 'international firm' and
the 'local' practices" (Daniels, Thrift, & Leyshon, 1989).
These
seven types are identified as:
| 1. |
The firm operates under its own international
name--for example, Arthur Andersen. |
| 2. |
A combined name is used where an international
firm affiliates with a local firm. |
| 3. |
A local name is used where the local firm is
totally affiliated with the international firm. |
| 4. |
An association or federation may be relied on
to coordinate activity among member firms. |
| 5. |
Correspondents may be used if an international
firm does not have an office in a locale and exclusively refers clients
to a single local firm. |
| 6. |
On rare occasions, a local firm may have multiple
affiliations with several international firms. |
| 7. |
A final case is when two or more names occur--where
an international firm practices under two or more national firm names. |
According to Brown, Cooperet al. (1996), the first alternative
(that of a common international name), is the one usually preferred by members
of the Big Six, although there are still instances where the affiliate will
use an alternate name or a hyphenated one. However, the general trend has been
a move to a single name and a single identity. The internationalization of the
major accounting firms has been going on for many years. Two distinct periods
of expansion have been identified by Daniels, Thrift, and Leyshon (1989).
The first period began in the 1890s and lasted until the start of World
War II in 1939. This period was entirely demand-driven, as accounting firms
in the United Kingdom supported the movement of U.K. firms setting up branches
in overseas markets. The latter period (which started in 1945), had a more structured
configuration as international accounting partnerships began to form. Here again,
the large accounting firms were following clients who were further internationalizing
their activity and moving outside their home country through foreign direct
investment. However, in this case, the move by accounting firms was to provide
auditing and advisory services to multinational clients.
The usual form of international expansion was via merger with national
practices in a local country. Arthur Andersen was one exception to the rule,
as it tried to establish its own offices, but even it has changed its approach
in recent years by engaging in merger activity. If mergers are deemed impossible,
the large firms may rely on one of the other alternatives listed above. On occasion,
when such alternatives have been unavailable or unviable, accounting firms have
established entirely new practices under the name of the parent firm. Once they
become feasible, the firm operates as a separate profit center, like any other
national firm, rather than as a mere branch of the parent firm sending profits
back to the head office.
Whatever pattern was followed, today, the Big-Six firms have offices
in virtually every country in the world. These national accounting firms are
the foundation of the international organization. In addition, each of the national
accounting firms has been refined to the point where it maintains a high degree
of independence. With the single exception of Arthur Andersen (which is centrally
directed worldwide), the Big-Six national firms now direct their own affairs,
allocate profits on a national basis, and independently decide on promotion
to partnership (Brown, Cooper et al., 1996, p. 59).
Please visit our new CPAfinder Forum and share your questions, thoughts and experiences.
|